By Forest Thigpen

To hear this commentary click here.

Governor Bryant is drawing some criticism for saying he was driven by his Christian faith to sign a particular law. Let’s think about that.

All public officials have a reason for the position they take on a piece of legislation. In some cases, it’s a desire to be re-elected; in other cases, they might want to reflect the majority of constituents they’ve heard from. But often, their votes are driven by a philosophy or ideology that reflects their understanding of the purpose of government.

The reality is that such a philosophy or ideology has been influenced by someone else. Maybe a professor in college, or a favorite philosopher or writer. Bernie Sanders, as a self-proclaimed socialist, presumably was influenced by the writings of Karl Marx.

The idea that being motivated by faith is a violation of the constitutional separation of church and state reflects a significant misunderstanding of that concept, which is a subject for another time. But today’s question comes down to this: Why would it be constitutional to be influenced by Karl Marx but not by Jesus Christ?

For more on this and other principles of governing, go to